DisputeSettlement争议解决,2023,9(5),2142-2149PublishedOnlineSeptember2023inHans.https://www.hanspub.org/journal/dshttps://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2023.95291文章引用:周博文.经营性虚拟盘案件的刑法定性[J].争议解决,2023,9(5):2142-2149.DOI:10.12677/ds.2023.95291经营性虚拟盘案件的刑法定性周博文华东政法大学刑事法学院，上海收稿日期：2023年7月20日；录用日期：2023年8月28日；发布日期：2023年9月5日摘要虚拟盘案件的刑法定性存在诈骗罪与非法经营罪的争议，主要是经营性虚拟盘案件中对平台信息虚假陈述行为、虚构形象引流并引导投资行为的行为应如何定性的问题。对徐某非法经营案中法官的观点进行检视，可以得出两条教义学规则：参考域外刑法对“事实”的研究，不确定的事实不能成为欺骗行为的内容；引入客观归责中“风险”的概念，欺骗行为应造成交易“风险”的提高。经营性虚拟盘案件中相关行为不符合欺骗行为的标准，若该当“变相期货交易”的要件，应认定非法经营罪。关键词虚拟盘，诈骗罪，非法经营罪，欺骗行为TheCriminalLawQualificationofOperatingVirtualMarketCaseBowenZhouSchoolofCriminalLaw,EastChinaUniversityofPoliticalScienceandLaw,ShanghaiReceived:Jul.20th,2023;accepted:Aug.28th,2023;published:Sep.5th,2023AbstractThereiscontentaboutthecontroversyoverthecriminallawqualificationofcrimeoffraudandcrimeofillegalbusinessinvirtualmarketcases.Themainissueishowtoqualifythebehavioroffalsestatementsofplatforminformation,andfictitiousexpertimagetoattractcustomersandguideinvestmentinoperatingvirtualmarketcase.Theexaminationofthejudge’sopinioninXu’sillegalbusinesscaseleadstotwopenaldogmaticrules:uncertainfactscannotbecomethecontentofdeceptionbehavior;deceptionbehaviorshouldincreasethe“risk”oftransactions.Therelevantbehaviorsinoperatingvirtualmarketcasedonotmeetthestandardsofdeceptionbehavior.If周博文DOI:10.12677/ds.2023.952912143争议解决theymeettherequirementsof“disguisedfuturestrading”,theyshouldberecognizedasillegalbusinesscrimes.KeywordsVirtualMarket,CrimeofFraud,IllegalBusinessCrimes,DeceptionBehaviorCopyright©2023byauthor(s)andHansPublishersInc.ThisworkislicensedundertheCreativeCommonsAttributionInternationalLicense...
