HUMANRIGHTS&TECHNOLOGYMathiasKlangCOMMUNICATIONCase1TECHNOLOGY&RIGHTS?Why&WhatTECHNOLOGYISNOTABOUTDEMOCRACYTechnology=Communication=Society=DemocracyCommunicationCommunicationOrganizationOrganizationProtestProtestAccessAccessReligionReligionPrivacyPrivacyCultureCultureEducationEducationPressPressTHEREARENOSIDEWALKSONLINELIFEISORGANIZEDAROUNDTECHNOLOGY……anditalwayshasbeen….BYCONTROLLINGTECHNOLOGYWECONTROLSOCIETYRegulationoftechnologyistheregulationofdemocracySOWHAT?SOWHAT?DISRUPTIVETECHNOLOGYThedisruptionoccurswhenthetechnology,whichisintroducedeffectsthesocialarrangementsaroundwhichwebuildourlivesIMPULSE:CONTROLANTIDOTE?FreeSoftwareREGULATIONFromCommandandControltoFuller&LessigWHAT’SWRONGWITHCOMMANDANDCONTROL?Itreliestoheavilyuponcoercionandcooperation.ONLINEOFFLINE“WeareformingourownSocialContract.Thisgovernancewillariseaccordingtotheconditionsofourworld,notyours.Ourworldisdifferent.”(Barlow1996)RegulatoryMetaphorLawSocialRulesContextual&programedArchitectureLessig(1999)CASESPaparazzi(1898)SurveillanceReklam(1902)•Robertsonv.RochesterFoldingBoxCo(1902)•ThecourtdidnotacceptBrandeis&Warrensargumentofa“commonlaw”rightSurveillanceHiddencamera1928•ExecutionofRuthSnyder1928SurveillanceSurveillanceSurveillanceLittlebrothersAmustforanyonewhoneedstoprotecttheirlovedones,homeorbusiness!SurveillanceSOLIDARITYCase4:GreenTwitter,LocationTehran,FacebookforMonksArikFraimovich(@arikfr)setuphelpiranelection.com&seekssupportfortheprotestersinIran.Supportby“greening”theTwitteravatarORGANISATIONHSBCFRA&theBloggquake(bloggbävning)Thankyou!TARGETINGTECHNOLOGYCase3:TheLufthansaCaseDoSDenialofService-examples•1998DoSattackagainsttheMexicanpresident’swebsite.•8,000hacktivistsparticipatedtoshowtheirsupportfortheZapatistas.•In2003theelectrohippiesantiwarprotestdisruptedthePM’swebpage(www.number-10.gov.uk/)causingittobeunavailableonseveraloccasions.DoS•Threewayhandshake(Gibson:www.grc.com)DenialofService-technologyDoSDenialofService-theplayers•TheElectrohippies–Practi...
