475JournalofTUSVol.38No.42023LegalIssuesoftheRiskCategoryofSportsActivitiesandtheOrganizer'sResponsibilityundertheVisionofNewSportsLawQIANSiwen（SchoolofBusiness，ChangshuInstituteofTechnology，Suzhou215500，China）Abstract�enewSportsLawemphasizesriskpreventioninmanyplaces，andforthefirsttimemakesclearprovisionsonsportsinsurance，whichisafurthersupplementtothesportsriskallocationframeworkoftheCivilCode.�eassumptionofriskclausefirstestablishedintheCivilCodetakesacautiousattitude，andsetrestrictionsonthescopeofapplication，sourcesofrisk，responsibilitiesoforganizersandotheraspects，whichiscalled“localizedassumptionofrisk”.Inherentriskisaninseparablepartofsportsactivities.�eapplicationofself-willingriskinsportsactivitiesshoulddistinguishthenatureofrisk.Itissuggestedthattheinherentrisksofsportsactivitiesshouldbedefinedinthewayof“summation+enumeration”，determinethe“obviousandnecessary”standard，andapplytheprincipleofassumptionofriskinthescopeofinherentrisk.Meanwhile，thesourcesofrisksinsportsactivitiesarediverse，sorisksshouldbeidentifiedbysubtypesandthelogicalrelationshipbetweenthemandtheresponsibilitiesoforganizersshouldbeclarified.�eassumptionofriskclauseofCivilCodetransferstheresponsibilityofsportsactivityorganizerstothesafetyguaranteeobligationwithoutconsideringthenatureofrisksofsportsactivities，aggravatesthedutyofattentionofsportsactivityorganizerstoinherentrisks，andreducestheenthusiasmofsocialsubjectstorunnationalfitnessundertakings.Itissuggestedthattheorganizersofsportsactivitiesshouldbeincludedinthesubjectofassumptionofrisk，emphasizingtheirexemptiondefenseagainstinherentrisksofsportsactivities，andassumingfaultresponsibilityforthepartexceedinginherentrisks.Atthesametime，theriskpreventionandsafetyguaranteemechanismofsportsactivitieswillbefurtherimprovedundertheframeworkoftheSportsLawthroughmeasuressuchasdeterminingthe“safetyredline”accuratelyidentifyingrisksinvariousprofessionalsportsfieldsbyindustryassociationsandothersubjects，determiningris...
