2023年3月第44卷第2期ForeignLanguageEducationMar.2023Vol.44No.2再论形义结合:以汉语名词谓语句为例杨静摘要:本文根据认知语法的象征性假设和意义建构观,提出认知语法视角下形义结合的内涵是语法结构与其表达的概念识解模式结合,而非与其激活的概念意义结合。据此,汉语名词谓语句的存在说明汉语句子的成立并不依赖于时间性强的动词,汉语民族在识解场景的要素时,更关注其中的“名物”,而非“行为”,昭显出汉语民族的思维具有强空间性。“汉语时空同态观”所言的名词谓语句虽可激活时间义和序列义,但并不能揭示汉语名词谓语句所反映的识解模式,其结论值得商榷。关键词:形义结合;语法结构义;汉语名词谓语句;时空同态观;汉语的强空间性中图分类号:H030文献标识码:A文章编号:1000-5544(2023)02-0044-07Abstract:BasedontheSymbolicHypothesisandSemanticConstructionViewofCognitiveGrammar,thispaperproposesthattheimplicationof“combiningformwithmeaning”bethatthesyntacticstructureshouldbecombinedwiththecon-strualmodelthatthestructureembodies,ratherthanwiththemeaningitevokes.Inlightofthis,nominalsentencesinChinesesuggestthatthewell-formednessofChinesesentencesisindependentoftheobligatoryoccurrenceofthepredicateverb,whichistemporalandprocessualinnature.Chinesepeopletendtofocusonnamesofthingsinsteadofactionswhenperceivingascene,whichindicatesthattheChinesepeoplearespatiality-oriented.The“time-spaceconflationview”groundingitsargumentsonthetemporalandsequentialmeaningthatthenominalsentenceevokes,failstorevealthecon-strualmodelofthenominalsentenceandthusitsconclusionissubjecttofurtherscrutinization.Keywords:combinationofformandmeaning;themeaningofgrammaticalstructure;Chinesenominalsentences;theviewoftime-spaceconflation;spatiality-prominenceofChinese1.引言“形式结合意义”是语言研究的老话题。朱德熙(1985:80)指出:语法研究的最终目的是要弄清楚语法形式和语法意义之间的对应关系。徐思益(1994)强调,形式和意义结合不是方法问题,而是语言观的原则问题。然而,近年来外语界出现的关于“英汉时空性特质差异”的讨论表明,学界对于形式和意义的内涵和外延,以及形式该如何结合意义等基础性问题依然没有达成共识。王文斌(2013,2019)从英汉语民族思维差异的视角审视英汉语言结构...
